|||
Home
Afflictions/Hazards
Classes
Deities
Equipment
FAQ
Feats
Magic Items
Monster Index
Mythic Index
NPC Index
Prestige Classes
Races
Rules
Skills
Spells/Rituals
Technology
Traits
Licenses
Projects
Sources
Tools
Contact Us
Contributors
Support the Archives
Maximize Menu
Archives of Nethys
Character Creation +
Classes
Feats
Prestige Classes
Races
Skills
Traits
Mythic Index
Deities
Equipment +
Equipment (Non-Magical)
Magic Items
Technology
FAQ
Spells/Rituals
Rules +
Afflictions
NPC Index
Rules
Tools
Hazards
Monsters
Sources
About the Archives +
Licenses
Projects
Contact Us
Contributors
Support the Archives
Toggle Theme
Archives of Nethys
Rules Index
|
GM Screen
Mastering Magic
/
Designing Spells
Components
Source
Ultimate Magic pg. 133
For the most part, a spell’s components have very little to do with its overall power level unless it requires a costly focus or material component or has no component at all. Most spells in the
Core Rulebook
have verbal and somatic components, and new spells should follow this trend.
The advantage of spells that don’t require verbal components is they can be cast in an area of
silence
, and thus there is the temptation to create silent versions of common combat spells. However, doing so devalues the
Silent Spell
feat, just like making swift-action spells devalues
Quicken Spell
, though not to such a great extent (casting two spells per round is a more serious problem than having a backup spell to counteract an unexpected
silence
). If casters decide they’d rather prepare a silent
magic missile
instead of
acid arrow
, or a silent
acid arrow
instead of
fireball
, they’ve deliberately chosen weaker options, and that’s fine.
The advantage of spells that don’t require somatic components is they can be cast when bound, grappled, or when both hands are full or occupied, and arcane spell failure doesn’t apply. Just as creating silent versions of spells devalues
Silent Spell
, making non-somatic spells devalues the
Still Spell
feat. The premise of the game is that most spells require words and gestures, and new spells should stick with that unless the theme of the spell suggests it wouldn’t require a somatic component, or it was specifically designed to escape bindings or grapples.
The advantage of spells that don’t require material components is they don’t require a spell component pouch (and in the rare circumstance in which if you’re grappled, you needn’t already have your material components in hand to cast the spell). Most material components are part of a spell for flavor rather than to satisfy rules. The guano and sulfur material components of
fireball
are there because early gunpowder (black powder) was made from guano and sulfur. The fur and glass rod material components of
lightning bolt
come from the ability to create a buildup of static electricity by rubbing fur against a glass rod. The game could present those spells without material components at all, and it would have a negligible effect on how the game plays (as proven by the “it has whatever I need” spell component pouch, and the sorcerer class getting Eschew Materials as a bonus feat)—they’re just in the spell for fun. Balance your spell assuming it has no material components or free material components, and then add them in if the flavor seems appropriate.
Costly material components should be used to prevent overzealous players from casting the spell as often as they want, because the spell either makes adventuring too easy if everyone in the party has it (such as
stoneskin
), allows the PCs to bypass key adventuring experiences like exploring and investigating (such as
augury
,
divination
, and
commune
), or allows the PCs to trivialize certain threats (such as
raise dead
and
restoration
). Balance a spell without costly material components if possible, usually by raising the spell level if it is too good for the intended level. Sometimes the power level of a spell is on target (like
augury
, as it makes sense to have a low-level divination spell for clerics), but the spell is valuable enough that players will overuse it if it’s free, so you have to apply a gp cost to moderate how often the PCs use it. Long-lasting defensive spells such as
glyph of warding
also fit into this category; if they were free, every spellcaster would cover her lair in them, casting one per day for the weeks or months of planning the NPC has before the PCs arrive. By giving
glyph of warding
a gp cost, it allows for more traditional adventuring—otherwise every square the PCs walk on is a potential trap, slowing play to a crawl as the PCs are forced to slowly and carefully search every square to notice the glyphs (given that a typical 5th-level rogue has +14 to Perception against a DC 28 glyph, meaning she fails most searches unless she takes 20).
Focus components are governed by the same rules as material components—in most cases they’re just there for flavor, and are only relevant if costly. A costly focus is like a costly material component, except it’s a one-time expenditure rather than a repeat expenditure, a barrier to entry that you can ignore once you’ve crossed the threshold. A costly focus is a good way to delay when PCs gain access to the spell, but once they have the materials, it’s essentially just like any other spell without a costly focus. As with material components, balance the spell for its level, and if it seems like the spell is too good and delaying access to it would help moderate it, consider adding a costly focus component.